|
3.2 |
Reasons for Order on Format of Bills.
In the written an oral submissions subscribers complained
of difficulties caused by the format (including in particular,
the brevity and language of the bill). They complained
of the difficulty of understanding the information presented
in the bill. The complaints regarding language of the
bill focused on the non availability of Suntel and Lanka
Bell bills in Sinhala and Tamil. The Committee found that
many complaints regarding taxes had been caused by an
erroneous translation into Sinhala of the phrase "
monthly rental " by SLTL, which has since been corrected.
Therefore, the Committee has not made an order about it.
The Committee believes that the order regarding format
will provide a useful framework for the operators in improving
the communicative aspects of their bills |
| 4.0
|
Periodicity of Bills
|
| 4.1 |
Within the overall framework of the licence condition
on periodicity of billing (Condition 22.2 for SLTL and
Condition 20.2 for Suntel and Lanka Bell), the Committee
of Inquiry orders the fixed access operators to improve
the periodicity of their bills by taking the following
measures |
| 4.1.1 |
Mail out the bills to their subscribers within 7 working
days of the end of the billing cycle, which must be clearly
indicated on the face of the bill. This shall be effected
within a period of one year from the date of this order |
| 4.1.2
|
Migrate
to multiple billing cycles a month within six months of
this order. In other words, the subscriber base should
be divided into multiple billing groups and the processing
of the bills of the different groups must be done at different
times of the moth. |
| 4.1.3
|
Automate
the transfer of billing records from exchanges to the
billing centers within two years of the date of this order,
taking necessary safeguards to ensure the integrity of
the process. |
| 4.2
|
Reasons
for Order on
The written and oral submission contained complaints that
payments were not accurately reflected in the bills, that
bills were not reguarly resented, and that there were
delays in billing. These actions on the part of SLTL appear
to have constituted pima facie violations of Licence Conditions
22.2. The Committee notes that during the past few years
and in particular the past few months SLTL has made significant
improvements in improving periodicity of billing. However
there is room for improvement in relation to preventing
arrears appearing on the bills of subscribers who have
made payments on time. This problem is caused by certain
shortcomings in the way that SLTL processes its bills.
SLTL manually transfers their billing records from exchanges
throughout the island to the single billing center located
in Colombo and then physically transports the printed
bills back to the regional exchanges where they are mailed
out. This current procedure causes a peak load on the
billing facilities because the billing records of all
of SLTL's subscribers are processed at one time. The Committee
notes that at least one other company has successfully
overcome this problem by having pultiple billing cycles.
The Committee believes that bills can be dispatched to
subscribers within seven days once the specified remedial
measures are taken. |
| 5.0
|
Payment
of Bills |
| 5.1 |
The Committee orders the fixed access operators to give
subscribers at least seven working days to settle the
bills from the reasonable date of receipt of the bill.
This shall be applicable irrespective of the mode or place
of payment. Under no circumstance shall a subscriber who
has made payment by the date specified in the bill be
penalized. A subscriber who is so penalized by an operator
shall be compensated at the rate of Rs.250 per day for
the period penal action. In addition to the daily compensation,
the operator shall offer free
reconnection if disconnection was the penal action effected. |