Reasons for Order re Payment of Bills
10.2 Reasons for Orders re Dispute Resolution.
The written and oral submissions made to the Committee revealed the urgent necessity of complaint handling mechanisms being put in place by Operators. The current procedures tended to discourage subscribers from pursuing their complaints with a view to obtaining redress within a reasonable time frame. Creating clear, well publicized procedures and a relatively independent dispute resolution body within each operator can help reduce the current levels of unproductive friction.
11.0 Errors in and/or Unavailability of Billing Records
11.1 The Committee of Inquiry orders that an operator shall bear the loss arising out of a situation where a billing record is erroneous or is unavailable. No operator shall charge average or other unsubstantiated amounts in these situations. The order shall apply to possible effects of the Y2K problem.
11.2 Reasons for the Order re Errors and/or Unavailability of Billing Records. The Committee heard evidence of several instances where an operator had charged average or estimated amounts when billing records were unavailable or erroneous. This is patently unfair. If there is an error in the billing record or if the billing record is unavailable the subscriber should not be penalized as it is not his/her fault.
12.0 Taxation
12.1 The Committee makes the following orders and decisions on the issue of taxation:
12.1.1 Goods and Services Tax on Monthly Rental
The Committee requests the Commission co re appeal to the Government to consider amending the relevant legislation to exempt rentals from GST in the case of all residential subscribers.
12.1.2

National Security Levy
The Committee orders the operators to charge the NSL at the currently applicable rate, on the gross invoiced
value excluding NSL. The Committee notes that this is the amount that the operators would be liable for if the
NSL is borne by tie company. The Committee believes that this action will help reduce the considerable
confusion surrounding this levy. Because there is discretion with regard to passing on the National Security
Levy to subscribers, its imposition on subscribers falls within the definition of a tariff increase. Therefore,
operators _directed to comply we relevant'. statutory and license conditions for tariff approvals within
six months from the date of this Order.
Reasons for Order and Decision re Taxes .

12.2.1 In written as well as oral submissions before the Committee, subscribers were quite vociferous about several alleged anomalies in the taxation process. These primarily related to the interpretation and application of the Goods and Services Tax (GST) and the National! Security Levy (NSL) to telecommunication services. Both being matters outside the scope of the Sri Lanka Telecommunications Act, No. 25 of 1991, as amended, the Committee was compelled to summon senior officials of the Department of Inland Revenue to the Hearing. The Committee gratefully acknowledges the contribution made by these officials. The officials clarified that the role of the Department of Inland Revenue is limited to the interpretation of the regulations and collection of taxes. The main argument advanced by the members of the public was that monthly rental, being a recovery over an extended period of the cost of providing connectivity to the network, should not be liable for GST. However, the Department of Inland Revenue is of the view that except in the case of zero rated or exempted items all other items are subject to GST' at the point of invoice, from April 1, 1998 (the date of implementation of GST). Since this is a pass through tax the operators have no alternative but to pass it on to the consumers. Whereas business subscribers can set it off against the output GST the residential consumers have no such recourse. However, the Committee is persuaded that no relief can be provided without amending the relevant legislation.
© 2002 Telecommunication Regulatory Commission of Sri Lanka, All Rights Reserved. Terms and Conditions. Privacy Policy